WSJ vs. Robb Report on Luxury Spending
Here’s an interesting debate on the role of luxury in our currently struggling economy. Recently on NPR’s Day to Day, Robert Frank of the Wall Street Journal talked about how the wealthy have curtailed their spending, not just on handbags, watches, jewelery, and designer clothes, but also on big-ticket items like yachts, private jets, and mansions.
Frank noted that this reduction in spending has an economic consequence–if the wealthy aren’t spending money, they aren’t creating jobs and supporting the economy. He also said those who are still spending are doing it on travel (to create memories), more sensible cars, things that are not as visible and could be considered to be ‘conscientious consumption’ rather than conspicious.
Then Frank made a slight dig at luxury magazines like Robb Report, which had been celebrating spending when so many people have become ashamed of it. This prompted Robb Report writer Jack Smith to respond in an op-ed in the Philadelphia Inquirer, saying that the rich are indulging too little and shouldn’t be ashamed — reiterating how their spending supports the economy. He had an example: stays at the penthouse suite at the Four Seasons New York cost $35,000 a night, and keep 12-15 staffers employed.
Frank in turn responded on his WSJ blog by agreeing that the wealthy should spend, but noting that the sales of personal helicopters, palatial mansions, polo ponies, and other big-ticket items might do more to make those who can’t afford such luxury upset at the fatcats who took advantage of bailouts and didn’t earn their wealth.
I think this was an interesting exchange, but it’s worth remembering that the true nature of luxury depends on how people interpret it. The wealthy might have a ‘responsibilty’ to spend to support the economy, but they also have a responsiblity to themselves to know what they want and make sure their spending is truly worthwhile.









